ETFs
Building A $50,000 Dividend Portfolio With 3 ETFs And 3 High Dividend Yield Stocks
William_Potter
Investment Thesis
In today’s article I will illustrate how you can build a $50,000 dividend portfolio with three ETFs and three individual companies. I will not only explain the reduced risk level of this dividend portfolio, I will also demonstrate the advantages of such a diversified dividend investment strategy when compared to a single ETF-approach.
I will show you in greater detail how combining ETFs like Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA:SCHD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:VOO) can help you to merge the benefits of investing in sustainable, reliable dividend-paying companies through SCHD. Moreover, offering the opportunity to invest in technology giants like Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), which offer particularly attractive risk-reward profiles, through VOO.
The portfolio that I will present today offers a Weighted Average Dividend Yield [TTM] of 3.36%, and a 5 Year Weighted Average Dividend Growth Rate [CAGR] of 8.63%. These figures indicate that the portfolio successfully combines dividend income with dividend growth.
Within this dividend portfolio, I have included the following three high dividend yield companies to increase its potential for generating income via dividend payments:
I believe that each of these picks are not only excellent choices when it comes to risk and reward, they also pay an attractive Dividend Yield [FWD] and offer potential for dividend growth. Furthermore, only Realty Income is already included in one of the ETFs in this portfolio, thereby ensuring reduced company-specific concentration risk.
I have included the below ETFs, which not only ensure a broad diversification across companies and sectors, but also enhance the risk-return profile for our dividend portfolio:
- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
- iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (NYSEARCA:DGRO)
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF is an excellent addition to this portfolio due to its inclusion of companies that pay sustainable dividends, reducing the likelihood of dividend cuts and increasing the potential for positive investment outcomes. SCHD’s lower risk level makes it particularly attractive compared to other ETFs.
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF is an attractive complement to SCHD, due to its potential for dividend growth, its stronger focus on companies from the technology sector, and its reduced risk-level (its Annualized Volatility stands at 11.12% while the Median of all ETFs is at 12.80%).
I believe that the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is particularly appealing for this portfolio because it significantly overweights companies in the technology sector. These companies are especially attractive in terms of risk and reward, offering investors elevated chances for positive investment outcomes.
The chart below illustrates how these selected ETFs and individual companies have performed within the past 5 years.
The graphic illustrates that among this selection, Ares Capital and the S&P 500, with Total Returns of 95.11% and 85.69% respectively, have performed the best.
This supports my investment thesis that building dividend portfolios comprising both ETFs and individual companies can offer significant benefits to investors.
With a Total Return of 4.19%, Realty Income has shown the lowest performance among this selection.
Overview of the 3 Selected ETFs and 3 High Dividend Yield Companies
Symbol |
Name |
Sector |
Industry |
Country |
Dividend Yield [TTM] |
Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR] |
Allocation |
Amount in $ |
SCHD |
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF |
ETF |
ETF |
United States |
3.37% |
11.80% |
40% |
20000 |
DGRO |
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF |
ETF |
ETF |
United States |
2.30% |
9.70% |
28% |
14000 |
VOO |
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF |
ETF |
ETF |
United States |
1.34% |
4.65% |
20% |
10000 |
ARCC |
Ares Capital |
Financials |
Asset Management and Custody Banks |
United States |
9.10% |
4.24% |
4% |
2000 |
O |
Realty Income |
Real Estate |
Retail REITs |
United States |
5.59% |
3.55% |
4% |
2000 |
TCPC |
BlackRock TCP Capital Corp |
Financials |
Asset Management and Custody Banks |
United States |
12.78% |
-1.14% |
4% |
2000 |
3.36% |
8.63% |
100% |
50000 |
Click to enlarge
Source: The Author, data from Seeking Alpha
Risk Analysis of The Current Composition of This Dividend Portfolio
Risk Analysis of the Portfolio Allocation per Company/ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF constitutes the largest share of this dividend portfolio at 40%, followed by iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF at 28%, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF at 20%, indicating that ETFs represent 88% of this portfolio.
This high percentage of the ETFs ensures that the proportion of each of the individual companies is relatively low, thereby reducing the company-specific concentration risk of this dividend portfolio. Realty Income, Ares Capital, and BlackRock TCP Capital Corp each account for 4% of the overall investment portfolio.
Risk Analysis of the Company-Specific Concentration Risk When Allocating SCHD, DGRO and VOO Across the Companies they Are Invested in
The below graphic shows the portfolio’s current allocation when distributing each of the ETFs (SCHD, DGRO and VOO) across the companies they are invested in. The companies highlighted in blue are direct investments while the ones in green are indirect investments via ETFs.
It is worth mentioning that Realty Income is the largest position of this portfolio, accounting for 4.02%, followed by BlackRock TCP Capital (4%), and Ares Capital (4%). The slightly higher allocation to Realty Income, compared to BlackRock TCP Capital and Ares Capital, results from the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF’s minor investment in Realty Income.
All other companies are indirect investments via the previously mentioned ETFs and account for less than 3% of the overall portfolio, indicating a low company-specific concentration risk: with 2.69%, Chevron is the fourth largest position of the portfolio, followed by PepsiCo (with 2.26%), Microsoft (2.26%), Coca-Cola (2.22%), Amgen (2.18%), AbbVie (2.18%), The Home Depot (2.10%), Cisco Systems (2.04%), and Apple (2.00%). All other companies represent less than 2% of the portfolio and are not part of this illustration.
Risk Analysis of the Portfolio’s Sector-Specific Concentration Risk When Distributing SCHD, DGRO, and VOO Across their Sectors
The illustration below demonstrates the portfolios current sector allocation when distributing SCHD, DGRO, and VOO across the sectors they are invested in.
The five sectors with the largest proportion compared to the overall portfolio are the Financials Sector (accounting for 22.82%), the Information Technology Sector (14.41%), the Health Care Sector (13.21%), the Industrials Sector (10.39%), and the Consumer Staples Sector (10.02%).
The remaining sectors each account for less than 8.5% of the overall portfolio, indicating its reduced sector specific concentration risk: the Energy Sector represents 8.43% of the overall portfolio, the Consumer Discretionary Sector 7.89%, the Real Estate Sector 4.46%, the Communication Services Sector 4.00%, the Utilities Sector 2.54%, and the Materials Sector 1.83%.
The reduced sector-specific concentration risk further indicates the decreased risk level of this portfolio, enhancing the likelihood of positive investment outcomes.
Risk Analysis: Analyzing the 5 Largest Positions of This Dividend Portfolio
Analysis of the Dividend Yield and Dividend Growth Potential of the 5 Largest Positions
The chart below illustrates that the selected dividend portfolio effectively combines dividend income and dividend growth, given the attractive dividend income and dividend growth potential of the five companies with the largest proportion of the portfolio.
With a Dividend Yield [TTM] of 9.10% and a 5 Year Dividend Growth Rate [CAGR] of 4.24%, Ares Capital mixes dividend income and dividend growth. Similarly, Realty Income, Chevron, and PepsiCo balance income and growth, boasting Dividend Yields [TTM] of 5.59%, 3.71%, and 2.81% along with 5-Year Dividend Growth Rates [CAGR] of 3.55%, 6.25%, and 6.40%, respectively.
Although BlackRock TCP Capital has experienced a negative 5-Year Dividend Growth Rate of -1.14%, it offers a double-digit Dividend Yield [TTM] of 12.78%, strongly contributing to the portfolio’s income generation via dividend payments.
These numbers reflect the sustainable dividends paid by the companies that are part of this portfolio along with the reduced risk they offer to investors.
Analysis of the 24M and 60M Beta Factors of the 5 Largest Positions of This Dividend Portfolio
The reduced risk level is further underscored by the low 24M and 60M Beta Factors of the five largest positions of this dividend portfolio.
It can be highlighted that all of the five largest companies exhibit a 24M Beta Factor below 0.8, indicating that this portfolio provides investors with a reduced volatility, which in turn implies a lowered risk-level: Realty Income, Ares Capital, BlackRock TCP Capital Corp, Chevron, and PepsiCo exhibit 24M Beta Factors of 0.62, 0.77, 0.64, 0.71, and 0.44 respectively.
Risk Analysis of the Equity Style of This Dividend Portfolio
The equity style of this dividend portfolio further underscores its reduced risk level. The chart below shows that 32% of the companies in the portfolio are large-cap value-focused, while 24% are large-cap companies balancing both value and growth (core), reinforcing my investment thesis that this dividend portfolio presents a lower risk level to investors.
The reduced portfolio allocation to small-cap companies (6% of the companies in the portfolio are small-cap value-focused and 1% are small-cap companies balancing both value and growth (core)) further strengthens this thesis.
The Additional Advantages of The Dividend Income Accelerator Portfolio in comparison to This Dividend Portfolio
With a Weighted Average Dividend Yield [TTM] of 3.36% and a 5 Year Weighted Average Dividend Growth Rate [CAGR] of 8.63%, this dividend portfolio effectively merges dividend income with dividend growth.
Here on Seeking Alpha I am building The Dividend Income Accelerator Portfolio, which offers investors a superior mix in terms of dividend income and dividend growth.
At this moment in time, the portfolio provides investors with a Weighted Average Dividend Yield [FWD] of 4.63%, and a 5 Year Weighted Average Dividend Growth Rate [CAGR] of 8.07%, while, at the same time, offering a broad diversification across companies and sectors in addition to a geographical diversification and an optimized risk-reward profile.
The primary goal of the Dividend Income Accelerator Portfolio is to enable you to invest with a reduced risk level, thereby increasing the chances of positive investment outcomes while generating substantial extra income through dividend payments. Additionally, the portfolio is designed to annually increase this dividend income due to its strong potential for dividend growth. In contrast to the portfolio presented in today’s article, The Dividend Income Accelerator Portfolio includes a bond ETF, contributing to further reducing portfolio volatility and decrease the overall portfolio risk-level. For these reasons, I believe that The Dividend Income Accelerator Portfolio provides investors with an even better risk-reward profile when compared to the portfolio presented in today’s article.
Conclusion
Building a diversified dividend portfolio with several ETFs and individual companies can provide investors with multiple advantages. These include an even broader diversification, optimized risk-reward profiles and better positioning to the investor’s personal financial goals and personal risk-tolerance.
The dividend portfolio presented in today’s article not only provides investors with a stable dividend income, but also positions the portfolio for growth, underscoring the advantages of a diversified dividend investment strategy over a single ETF-approach.
Even though a single ETF-approach with exclusively investing in SCHD would imply a superior mix of dividend income and dividend growth (SCHD’s Dividend Yield [TTM] and 5 Year Dividend Growth Rate [CAGR] are 3.37% and 11.80% when compared to the 3.36% and 8.63% of this dividend portfolio), the portfolio presented in today’s article provides you with an even broader diversification across companies and sectors when compared to exclusively investing in SCHD.
In addition to that, such a portfolio offers the advantages of including companies from the S&P 500, which are particularly attractive when it comes to risk and reward but are not part of SCHD. Both Apple, which represents 5.64% of the S&P 500, and Microsoft, accounting for 7.09%, can be named as examples. By investing exclusively in SCHD, for example, you would miss out on the attractive risk-reward profiles of these U.S. tech giants.
The elevated diversification of this dividend portfolio provides you with increased chances to perform well in any market condition, which is one of the objectives of the dividend portfolios I am building and constantly publishing here on Seeking Alpha.
In case you prioritize the generation of dividend income, you could slightly increase the proportion of SCHD and include additional companies that pay an attractive Dividend Yield.
Alternatively, if your primary goal is to achieve a higher Total Return, you might boost the proportion allocated to VOO and include additional single companies that are particularly attractive in terms of risk and reward. Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) can be named as an example that is particularly attractive when it comes to risk and reward, given its portfolio of companies with wide economic moats and its long track record of outperforming indices.
One of the primary risk-factors of the dividend portfolio presented in today’s article is the absence of fixed income assets. This elevates the risk level for investors, especially for those that do not invest over the long-term. For this reason, I generally suggest a long-term investment-approach.
In case you would like to further reduce the volatility of this dividend portfolio, I suggest including U.S. government bonds. This approach can help you to further reduce the downside risk of this portfolio, particularly over the short term.
The strategies mentioned allow you to tailor your portfolio to meet your personal financial goals and risk tolerance, enabling you to create a portfolio that best suits your needs.
It would be great to hear if you also combine ETFs with single companies within your dividend portfolio. Do you?
ETFs
Missed the Bull Market Resumption? 3 ETFs to Help You Build Wealth for Decades
The market’s rebound from the 2022 bear market was not only unexpected. It was also bigger than expected. S&P 500 The stock price is up 60% from the bear market low, despite no clear signs at the time that such a rally was in the works. Chances are you missed at least part of this current rally.
If so, don’t be discouraged: you’re in good company. You’re also far from financially ruined. While you can’t go back and make up for the missed opportunity, for long-term investors, the growth potential is much greater.
If you want to make sure you don’t miss the next big bull run, you might want to tweak your strategy a bit. This time around, you might try buying fewer stocks and focusing more on exchange traded funds (or ETFs), which are often easier to hold when things get tough for the overall market.
With that in mind, here’s a closer look at three very different ETFs to consider buying that could – collectively – complement your portfolio brilliantly.
Let’s start with the basics: dividend growth
Most investors naturally favor growth, choosing growth stocks to achieve that goal. And the strategy usually works. However, most long-term investors may not realize that they can get the same type of net return with boring dividend stocks like the ones held in the portfolio. Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT: VIG) which reflects the S&P US Dividend Growth Index.
As the name suggests, this Vanguard fund and its underlying index hold stocks that not only pay consistent dividends, but also have a history of consistently increasing dividends. To be included in the S&P US Dividend Growers Index, a company must have increased its dividend every year for at least the past 10 years. In most cases, however, they have been doing so for much longer.
The ETF’s current dividend yield of just under 1.8% isn’t exactly exciting. In fact, it’s so low that investors might wonder how this fund is keeping up with the broader market, let alone growth stocks. What’s being grossly underestimated here is the sheer magnitude of these stocks. dividend growthOver the past 10 years, its dividend per share has nearly doubled, and more than tripled from 15 years ago.
The reason is that solid dividend stocks generally outperform their non-dividend-paying counterparts. Calculations by mutual fund firm Hartford indicate that since 1973, S&P 500 stocks with a long history of dividend growth have averaged a single-digit annual return, compared with a much more modest 4.3% annual gain for non-dividend-paying stocks, and an average annual return of just 7.7% for an equal-weighted version of the S&P 500. The numbers confirm that there’s a lot to be said for reliable, consistent income.
The story continues
Then add capital appreciation through technology
That said, there’s no particular reason why your portfolio can’t also hold something a little more volatile than a dividend-focused holding. If you can stomach the volatility that’s sure to continue, take a stake in the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ).
This Invesco ETF (often called the “cubes” or the triple-Q) is based on the Nasdaq-100 index. Typically, this index consists of 100 of the Nasdaq Composite IndexThe index is one of the largest non-financial indices at any given time. It is updated quarterly, although extreme imbalance situations may result in unplanned rebalancing of the index.
That’s not what makes this fund a must-have for many investors, though. It turns out that most high-growth tech companies choose to list their shares through the Nasdaq Sotck exchange rather than other exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock ExchangeNames like Apple, MicrosoftAnd Nvidia are not only Nasdaq-listed securities. They are also the top holdings of this ETF, with Amazon, Meta-platformsand Google’s parent company AlphabetThese are of course some of the highest-yielding stocks on the market in recent years.
This won’t always be the case. Just as companies like Nvidia and Apple have squeezed other names out of the index to make room for their stocks, these current names could also be replaced by other names (although it will likely be a while before that happens). It’s the proverbial life cycle of the market.
This shift, however, will likely be driven by technology companies that are offering revolutionary products and services. Owning a stake in the Invesco QQQ Trust is a simple, low-cost way to ensure you’re invested in at least most of their stocks at the perfect time.
Don’t forget indexing, but try a different approach
Finally, while Triple-Q and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation funds are smart ways to diversify your portfolio over the long term, the good old indexing strategy still works. In other words, rather than risk underperforming the market by trying to beat it, stick to tracking the long-term performance of a broad stock index.
Most investors will opt for something like the SPDR S&P 500 Exchange Traded Fund (NYSEMKT:SPY), which of course mirrors the large-cap S&P 500 index. And if you already own one, great: stick with it.
If and when you have some spare cash to put to good use, consider starting a mid-cap funds as the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (NYSEMKT: IJH) instead. Why? Because you’ll likely get better results with this ETF than you will with large-cap index funds. Over the past 30 years, S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index significantly outperformed the S&P 500.
^MID Chart
The disparate degree of gains actually makes sense. While no one disputes the solid foundations on which most S&P 500 companies are built, they are in many ways victims of their own size: It’s hard to get bigger when you’re already big. This is in contrast to the mid-cap companies that make up the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index. These organizations have moved past their rocky, shaky early years and are just entering their era of high growth. Not all of them will survive this phase, but companies like Advanced microsystems And Super microcomputer Those that survive end up being incredibly rewarding to their patient shareholders.
Should You Invest $1,000 in iShares Trust – iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF Right Now?
Before purchasing shares of iShares Trust – iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF, consider the following:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team has just identified what they believe to be the 10 best stocks Investors should buy now…and the iShares Trust – iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks selected could generate monstrous returns in the years to come.
Consider when Nvidia I made this list on April 15, 2005… if you had $1,000 invested at the time of our recommendation, you would have $791,929!*
Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including portfolio construction advice, regular analyst updates, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service offers more than quadrupled the return of the S&P 500 since 2002*.
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 8, 2024
John Mackey, former CEO of Amazon’s Whole Foods Market, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, former director of market development and spokesperson for Facebook and sister of Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. James Brumley has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard Specialized Funds – Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Nasdaq and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a position in Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard Specialized Funds – Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Nasdaq and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. disclosure policy.
Missed the Bull Market Resumption? 3 ETFs to Help You Build Wealth for Decades was originally published by The Motley Fool
ETFs
This Simple ETF Could Turn $500 a Month Into $1 Million
This large-cap ETF offers investors the potential for above-market returns while minimizing risk.
It’s always inspiring to hear stories of people who invested in a company and made tons of money as the company grew and became successful. While these stories are a testament to the power of investing, they can also be misleading. That’s not because it doesn’t happen often, but because you don’t have to make a big splash on a single company to make a lot of money in the stock market.
Invest regularly in exchange traded funds (AND F) is a great way to build wealth. ETFs allow you to invest in dozens, hundreds, and sometimes thousands of companies in a single investment. For investors looking for an ETF that can help them become millionaires, look no further than the Vanguard Growth ETFs (VUG 0.61%).
A history of outperforming the market
Since its launch in January 2004, this ETF has outperformed the market (based on S&P 500 Back), with an average total return of around 11.6%. The returns are even more impressive when looking back over the past decade, with the ETF posting an average total return of around 15.7%.
The ETF’s past success doesn’t mean it will continue on this path, but for the sake of illustration, let’s take a middle ground and assume it averages about 13% annual returns over the long term. Averaging those returns, monthly investments of $500 could top the $1 million mark in just over 25 years.
Assuming (emphasis on the word “assume”) that the ETF continues to generate an average total return of 15.7% over the past decade, investing $500 a month could get you past $1 million in about 23 years. At an annual return of 11.6%, that would take nearly 28 years.
There is no way to predict the future performance of the ETF, but the most important thing is the power of time and Compound profit. Earning $1 million by saving alone is a difficult and unachievable task for most people. However, it becomes much more achievable if you give yourself time and make regular investments, no matter how small.
So why choose the Vanguard Growth ETF?
This ETF can offer investors the best of both worlds. On the one hand, since it only contains large cap stocksIt offers more stability and less volatility than you typically find with smaller growth stocks. At the other end, the focus on growth means it is built with the goal of outperforming the market.
Investing involves a tradeoff between risk and return, and this ETF falls somewhere in the middle for the most part. That’s not just because it only contains large-cap stocks. It’s also because large-cap stocks are leading the way. Here are the ETF’s top 10 holdings:
- Microsoft: 12.60%
- Apple: 11.51%
- Nvidia: 10.61%
- Alphabet (both share classes): 7.54%
- Amazon: 6.72%
- Meta-platforms: 4.21%
- Eli Lilly: 2.88%
- You’re here: 1.98%
- Visa: 1.72%
The Vanguard Growth ETF is not as diversified as other broad ETFs, with the top 10 holdings making up nearly 60% of the fund and the “The Magnificent Seven” with stocks accounting for about 55%. However, many of these companies (particularly mega-cap technology stocks) have been among the best performers in the stock market over the past decade and still have great growth opportunities ahead of them.
Big tech stocks are expected to continue to see growth in areas such as cloud computing, artificial intelligenceand cybersecurity; Eli Lilly will benefit from advances in biotechnologyTesla is one of the leaders in electric vehicles, which are still in the early stages of development; and Visa is expected to be one of the forerunners as the world moves toward more digital payments.
ETF concentration adds risk, especially if Microsoft, Apple or Nvidia is experiencing a slowdownBut these companies are well positioned to drive long-term growth despite any short-term setbacks that may arise. Consistent investments over time in the Vanguard Growth ETF should pay off for investors.
Randi Zuckerberg, former head of market development and spokesperson for Facebook and sister of Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Stefon Walters has positions in Apple and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, Vanguard Index Funds-Vanguard Growth ETF, and Visa. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a position in shares of Apple and Microsoft. disclosure policy.
ETFs
Ethereum ETFs Could Bring in $1 Billion a Month
In a recent interview with Bloomberg, Kraken’s chief strategy officer Thomas Perfumo predicted that Ethereum ETFs could attract between $750 million and $1 billion in monthly investments.
“Market sentiment is being priced in. I think the market has priced in something like $750 million to $1 billion of net inflows into Ethereum ETF products each month,” Perfumo said.
In the interviewPerfumo noted that if inflows exceed expectations, it could provide strong support to the industry and potentially drive Ethereum to new record highs.
This creates positive support for the industry, if we go beyond that, note that Bitcoin was at a rate above $2.5 billion
He said
Moreover, the hype around Ethereum ETFs has already sparked some optimism among investors. After the SEC approved the 19b-4 filing, Ethereum’s price jumped 22%, attracting investment into crypto assets.
This price movement shows how sensitive the market is to regulatory changes and the growth potential once ETFs are approved.
Perfumo also highlighted other factors supporting current market sentiment, including the upcoming US elections and a potential interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve. Recent US CPI data suggests disinflation on a monthly and annual basis, with some traditional firms predicting rate cuts as early as September.
These broader economic factors, combined with developments in the crypto space, are shaping the overall market outlook.
Regarding Kraken’s strategy, Perfumo highlighted the exchange’s goal of driving cryptocurrency adoption through strategic initiatives. When asked about rumors of Kraken going public, he reiterated that the company’s intention is instead to broaden cryptocurrency adoption.
Read also : Invesco, Galaxy Cut Ether ETF Fees to 0.25% in Competitive Market
ETFs
Kraken Executive Expects Ethereum ETF Launch to “Lift All Boats”
Kraken Chief Strategy Officer Thomas Perfumemo said: Ethereum ETFs (ETH) could help the crypto sector while commenting on political developments in the United States.
On July 12, Perfumo told Bloomberg that spot Ethereum ETFs would attract capital flows while drawing attention to crypto, noting:
“It’s a rising tide, which lifts the whole history of the boat.”
Perfumo further explained that the final value of Ethereum “depends on the Ethereum ETF.”
He said the cryptocurrency market is “pricing in” between $750 million and $1 billion in net inflows into Ethereum products on a monthly basis, which would imply that Ethereum could reach all-time highs between $4,000 and $5,000.
Perfumo also compared expectations to Bitcoin’s all-time high in March, which he called a “silent spike” that occurred without any evidence of millions of new investors entering the industry.
Political evolution
Perfumo also commented on political developments. At the beginning of the interview, he said that the results of the US elections “will set the tone for policymaking and the legislative agenda for the next four years.”
He also stressed the importance of legislative action and clarity and noted that recent developments show bipartisan support in Congress.
The House recently voted to pass the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) and attempted to repeal controversial SEC accounting rules with the Senate. However, the president Joe Biden Chosen to veto The resolution.
Perfume said:
“Even if you encounter obstacles at the executive level, [there’s] “There is still good progress to come.”
He added that the Republican Party appears “more pro-crypto.” [and] “more progressive” on the issue, noting Donald Trump plans to attend the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville.
Trump has also made numerous statements in support of pro-crypto policy, including at recent campaign events in Wisconsin And San Francisco.
Mentioned in this article
-
DeFi6 months ago
Switchboard Revolutionizes DeFi with New Oracle Aggregator
-
Fintech9 months ago
Fintech unicorn Zeta launches credit as a UPI-linked service for banks
-
DeFi8 months ago
👀 Lido prepares its response to the recovery boom
-
News6 months ago
Latest Business News Live Updates Today, July 11, 2024
-
DeFi6 months ago
Is Zypto Wallet a Reliable Choice for DeFi Users?
-
Fintech6 months ago
FinTech LIVE New York: Mastercard and the Power of Partnership
-
News8 months ago
Salesforce Q1 2025 Earnings Report (CRM)
-
DeFi6 months ago
Ethena downplays danger of letting traders use USDe to back risky bets – DL News
-
News8 months ago
Think Finance Loan Repayment Scam Victims to Get $384 Million
-
ETFs9 months ago
Gold ETFs see first outing after March 2023 at ₹396 cr on profit booking
-
Videos8 months ago
“We will enter the ‘banana zone’ in 2 WEEKS! Cryptocurrency prices will quadruple!” – Raoul Pal
-
Videos9 months ago
PREPARE! Millions of People Will Buy Bitcoin When the “ULTIMATE COLLAPSE” Begins in 2024 – Larry Lepard